Australia values the rights of bigots more than the lives of Aboriginal people

24 Mar 2017

The furore over Bill Leak’s death, and the effect it had on the RDA shows again that the dominant class do not value Aboriginal life, writes Amy McQuire.

The furore over Bill Leak’s death, and the effect it had on the RDA shows again that the dominant class do not value Aboriginal life, writes Amy McQuire.

In the acres of coverage in The Australian newspaper’s over-the-top tribute to late cartoonist Bill Leak this month, one stood out. It was by national political editor Simon Benson, and outlined how Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull had come to change his stance on the Racial Discrimination Act’s section 18c, following the death of his long-time buddy Leak.

Turnbull had been one of the dissenters when his predecessor Tony Abbott tried to push through changes to the act back in 2014, the days where George Brandis proudly proclaimed people had a ‘right to be bigots’ (a fact we know all to well judging from his own party’s record).

According to Benson, on the morning of Leak’s death, and before hearing of his passing, Turnbull had secured agreement from Cabinet to amend 18c in a three-hour meeting.

After Leak’s death: “Turnbull choked back tears when he lead a memorial service at Sydney Town Hall… Leak had made a lasting impact on the Prime Minister’s life over the 31 years they had known each other – roughly half of both their lives.
‘Bill Leak was accused of racism because of a cartoon, because of a cartoon,’ Turnbull told the assembled mourners. ‘Bill should have grown old and even more wiry.’

Benson continued: “The case against Leak in the Human Rights Commission under 18c, terminated before he died, was based on a complaint about a cartoon confronting an uncomfortable, tragic truth of indigenous (sic) social dysfunction.
“It had riled Turnbull. Just as the case against the QUT students had started to shape a determination to deal with what he had long believed was an absurdity. ‘Why should it be illegal to hurt someone’s feelings’, Turnbull would tell colleagues. The two cases became the catalyst for the decision he announced (on 18c).”

This article is startling in its lack of self-awareness, but it shows the extent to which Leak’s death played in the Coalition’s decision-making. It’s been said that the amendments to section 18c can basically be called ‘Leak’s law’.

The fact that a law offering a very weak protection to the most vulnerable in this country can be amended to suit the sensibilities of a privileged white cartoonist, so powerful he even has the ear of the Prime Minister, speaks volumes to this country and the lives it affords most worth to.

The

Back to Stories
Related posts

Impact statement from Nathan Booth’s family

Nathan Booth was reported missing in July 2019, and after months of inaction from the police, his body was found in December that year, in the Murrumbidgee. After five years of waiting, the inquest into Nathan’s death is continuing this week. Yesterday Nathan’s family made a statement, which we have published with their permission.

Sorry Day: “I don’t want to stand here in 10 years-time doing the same thing”

Disclaimer: Readers please be advised this article mentions the historical and ongoing Stolen Generations, Aboriginal children being taken from their families and contains images of…

The Royal Commission Report into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody shows a history of no police accountability

Readers please be advised this article mentions harm against Aboriginal people, deaths in custody, names of people who have passed away, and racist terminology. In…

Enquire now

If you are interested in our services or have any specific questions, please send us an enquiry.